Kenneth H. Hooks, III and Lindi Hooks v. Berkshire Hathaway Automotive d/b/a Vandergriff Acura ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                              STATE OF LOUISIANA
    COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
    KENNETH           H.        HOOKS,            III       AND                                                 NO.           2019    CW        154C
    LINDI        HOOKS
    VERSUS
    BERKSHIRE              HATHAWAY
    AUTOMOTIVE                  D/ B/ A          VANDERGRIFF                                                        MAY 12 2020
    ACURA
    In    Re:              Artex            Automotive                 Sales      II,        LLC    d/ b/ a        Vandergriff             Acura,
    applying                for       supervisory writs,                          19th       Judicial          District
    Court,                Parish       of       East      Baton        Rouge,          No.       682112.
    BEFORE:                McCLENDON,                  WELCH,           AND      HOLDRIDGE,              JJ.
    WRIT           DENIED.
    JEW
    GH
    McClendon,                      J.,        concurs            in   part         and    dissents             in    part.             It    is
    not    disputed               that           the parties                 signed the             Purchase             Agreement              dated
    April       13,
    2019 containing the Arbitration Clause, which indicates
    that    the parties presumptively agreed to arbitrate any disputes.
    Jasper       Contractors,                       Inc.          v.    E- Claim. com,              LLC,       2011- 0978 (           La.        App.
    1st     Cir.           5/    4/       12),         
    94 So. 3d 123
    ,         130     n. 7.       Plaintiffs                do         not
    challenge              the            arbitration                  clause          itself;          rather,           the    challenges
    asserted by plaintiffs                                   are       directed              to    the      contract            as    a    whole.
    Such    challenges                      to    the       contract             as    a whole must                go    to    arbitration.
    Jasper Contractors,                            
    94 So. 3d at 133
     (        quoting Buckeye Check Cashing,
    Inc.    v.        Cardegna,                   
    546 U. S. 440
    ,        449,        126    S . Ct.        1204,        1210,           
    163 L. Ed. 2d 1038
     (              2006)) .          It     cannot         be        said    with        positive             assurance
    that    the Arbitration                            Clause           in     this         case    is    not       susceptible                 of    an
    interpretation                        that     would cover                   the    dispute          at    issue.          Aguillard v.
    Auction           Mgmt.               Corp.,            2004- 2804 (              La.     6/ 29/ 05),           
    908 So. 2d 1
    ,        18.
    Accordingly,                      I    would            reverse            the      portion          of        the       trial        court'       s
    judgment           dated               October            31,         2019        denying         the dilatory exception
    pleading           the            objection               of prematurity                      filed by defendant, Artex
    Automotive              Sales                II,        LLC      d/ b/ a      Vandergriff               Acura,            and stay the
    trial       court           proceedings                      pending          arbitration                 of    these        matters in
    accordance              with            the        terms         of    the        Arbitration              Clause          contained              in
    the Purchase Agreement signed by the parties on April 13,                                                                         2019.           In
    all other respects, I would deny the wr--t application.
    COURT       OF    APPEAL,                FIRST           CIRCUIT
    DEPUTY          CL         RK     OF    COURT
    FOR        THE         COURT
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2019CW1540

Filed Date: 5/12/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024