State Of Louisiana v. Jonathan Williford ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                       STATE OF LOUISIANA
    COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
    STATE       OF       LOUISIANA                                                                             NO.      2019         KW     1632
    VERSUS
    JONATHAN             WILLIFORD
    WAR 1-3 MI
    In    Re:             Jonathan                  Williford,              applying             for           supervisory                  writs,
    21st            Judicial              District              Court,         Parish            of      Livingston,
    Nos.           19-- FELN- 039709,                 19- MISD- 120566.
    BEFORE:               McDONALD,                 THERIOT,          AND       CHUTZ,         JJ.
    WRIT         DENIED.                  As     an    indigent             inmate,         relator            is     entitled             to
    receive              certain               court            documents,               such         as        the      guilty                  plea
    transcript,                     the         bill            of         information                or            indictment,                   the
    commitment                 papers,             the     court       minutes           for     various              portions              of    the
    trial,          and minutes                    of     the    sentencing,                 free     of       charge          without            the
    necessity                 of    establishing   a particularized    need.     See  State ex
    rel.        Simmons             v. State,  93- 0275 ( La. 12/ 16/ 94),   
    647 So. 2d 1094
    ,
    1095 (          per        curiam).                   As     to     all           other      documents,                   an      indigent
    inmate has                 the constitutional right to                                    free copies only in those
    instances                 in     which           he        shows        that        denial            of      the       request              will
    deprive              him        of     an       adequate           opportunity                   to     present             his         claims
    fairly.                    Meeting              that         constitutional                      threshold                 requires               a
    showing              of    a    particularized                    need.             An    inmate,             therefore,                cannot
    make        a    showing              of        particularized                    need       absent           a     properly                filed
    application                    for      postconviction                      relief,          which          sets         out      specific
    claims               of         constitutional                      errors               requiring                 the           requested
    documentation                        for        support.                    See     State         ex          rel.         Bernard              v.
    Criminal              District             Court           Section "          J",        94- 2247 (         La.         4/ 28/ 95),            
    653 So. 2d 1174
    ,              1175 (      per       curiam).
    Without                the        showing           of    a     particularized                     need,         relator             may
    need        to       seek           his     requested              documents              under            the      Public             Records
    Law.                 However,              a         writ        application                 arising              in       a      criminal
    proceeding                 is       not     the        proper          procedural             vehicle              to     establish                  a
    right           to    records              under       the        Public           Records        Law.             La,         R. S.        44: 1,
    et     seq.           A    person           who       wants        to       examine        public             records            must        make
    the     request                to     the       custodian              of    records.             See         La.        R. S.         44: 31 &
    44: 32.               If        a     request               for     public           records               is      denied              by     the
    custodian,                 before   seeking                       relief           from      this          court,           the         person
    must        first          institute civil                    proceedings                 for     a     writ        of     mandamus             at
    the     district                 court          level.            See        La.     R. S.       44: 35( A).                   Should          the
    person          prevail,              he       should be           prepared to pay the                             regular             service
    fees        for           copies           of        the    documents.                    After         the        district                 court
    rules           in    the       civil           proceeding,              the       person may               seek         an      appeal         of
    the      district                   court'       s     action,              if     he     desires.                   See         La.         R. S.
    44: 35( C).                    See    also           State        ex        rel.     McKnight              v.       State,             98- 2258
    La.     App.             1st    Cir.       12/ 3/ 98),            
    742 So. 2d 894
    ,        895 (       per    curiam).
    JMM
    MRT
    WRC
    CO          OF       APPE        L,       FIRST       CIRCUIT
    DEPUTY             C    ERK       OF       COURT
    FOR    THE       COURT
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2019KW1632

Filed Date: 3/13/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024