Gustave J. Labarre, Jr. v. Occidental Chemical Company ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                            NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
    STATE OF LOUISIANA
    a                                     COURT OF APPEAL
    FIRST CIRCUIT
    2019 CA 0624
    J
    GUSTAVE J. LABARRE, JR., ET AL.
    VERSUS
    OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, ET AL.
    Judgment Rendered. -
    FEB 19 2020
    X iXXX'. 7C 7C
    Appealed from the 23rd Judicial District Court
    In and for the Parish of Assumption
    State of Louisiana
    Case No. 33796
    The Honorable Jason Verdigets, Judge Presiding
    Leopold Z. Sher                                 Counsel for
    James M. Garner                                 Defendant/Third- Party
    Peter L. Hilbert, Jr.                           Plaintiff/Appellant
    Christopher T. Chocheles                        Texas Brine Company, LLC
    Jeffrey D. Kessler
    David A. Freedman
    New Orleans, Louisiana
    Robert Ryland Percy, III
    Travis J. Turner
    Gonzales, Louisiana
    Dane S. Ciolino
    Metairie, Louisiana
    James E. Kuhn
    Ponchatula, Louisiana
    Matthew J. Randazzo, III                                 Counsel for
    Christopher B. Bailey                                    Third -Party Defendants/ Appellees
    Will Montz                                               Browning Oil Company, Inc.,
    Lafayette, Louisiana                                     LORCA Corporation, and
    Colorado Crude Company
    Joseph L. Shea, Jr.                                      Counsel for
    Katherine Smith Baker                                    Third -Party Defendant/Appellee
    Ashley G. Gable                                          Reliance Petroleum Corporation
    Joshua S. Chevallier
    Shreveport, Louisiana
    Frank H. Spruiell, Jr.                                   Counsel for
    Reid A. Jones                                            Third -Party Defendant/Appellee
    Seth M. Moyers                                           Sol Kirschner
    Anna W. O' Neal
    Shreveport, Louisiana
    X C 7C J? CX    C
    BEFORE: WELCH, LANIER, AND BURRIS, JJ.'
    Judge William J. Burris, retired, is serving pro tempere by special appointment of the Louisiana
    Supreme Court.
    2
    LANIER, J.
    This dispute is one of many arising out of the August 2012 sinkhole that
    appeared near Bayou Corne in Assumption Parish.                  This appeal relates to a
    challenge to the trial court' s dismissal of the third -party demands by Texas Brine
    Company, LLC (" Texas Brine") against multiple parties, including the third -party
    defendants herein, Reliance Petroleum Corporation, Browning Oil Company, Inc.,
    LORCA Corporation, Colorado Crude Company, and Sol Kirschner ( collectively,
    the oil and gas parties"),      based on res judicata and collateral estoppel. The same
    issue was recently decided by this court in a related appeal that originated out of a
    different trial court number ( No. 34270, 23rd Judicial District Court, Assumption
    Parish),   but was rendered by the same trial court judge on the same date,
    concerning the same oil and gas parties and Texas Brine. See Marchand v. Texas
    Brine Company, LLC, 2019- 0052 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 12/ 27/ 19),                      So. 3d ,
    
    2019 WL 7206880
    . 2
    In Marchand, this court affirmed the trial court's judgment sustaining the
    exceptions of res judicata and collateral estoppel filed by the oil and gas parties,
    and the dismissal, with prejudice, of Texas Brine's third -party demands against the
    oil and gas parties.       Marchand,         So. 3d at ,      
    2019 WL 7206880
    , at * 2- 3.
    After a thorough review of the record, we find no material distinctions between the
    evidence and arguments asserted in this appeal and those presented in the
    Marchand appeal.           The exact same background, issues, and assignments of error
    raised by Texas Brine in this case have already been thoroughly discussed in
    Marchand, which we are bound to follow under the " law of the circuit doctrine"
    that requires us to follow our prior decisions. Pontchartrain Natural Gas System
    2 The main difference between the related Marchand appeal and the instant appeal is that there
    are different pipeline plaintiffs in the case sub judice. This appeal, however, does not concern
    the pipeline plaintiffs.
    3
    v. Texas Brine Company, LLC, 2018- 0001 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 6/ 4/ 18), 
    253 So. 3d 156
    , writ denied, 2018- 1124 ( La. 9/ 28/ 18), 
    253 So. 3d 147
    .
    We issue this summary disposition in accordance with Uniform Rules—
    Courts of Appeal, Rule 2- 16. 2( A)(2), ( 4), and ( 6), and affirm the trial court's July
    16, 2018 judgment sustaining the exception raising the objections of res judicata
    and collateral estoppel and dismissing, with prejudice, Texas Brine's third -party
    demands against Reliance Petroleum Corporation, Browning Oil Company, Inc.,
    LORCA Corporation, Colorado Crude Company, and Sol Kirschner.               All costs of
    this appeal are assessed to Texas Brine Company, LLC.
    AFFIRMED.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2019CA0624

Filed Date: 2/19/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024