State Of Louisiana v. Anthony J. Lacassin ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                    STATE OF LOUISIANA
    COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
    STATE       OF    LOUISIANA                                                                     NO.      2019         Kw     0536
    VERSUS
    JAN 15 2020
    ANTHONY          J.    LACASSIN
    In    Re:             Anthony         J.      Lacassin,             applying            for     supervisory                writs,
    21st         Judicial            District          Court,          Parish        of          Livingston,
    No.     07 - FELLA - 022477.
    BEFORE:               WHIPPLE,          C. J.,         GUIDRY   AND       McDONALD,            JJ.
    WRIT          DENIED.
    JMM
    Whipple,               C. J.,         concurs         and        would          deny       the        writ         on     the
    showing          made.
    Guidry,              J.,     dissents.                The    indictment               indicated              the        dates
    of    the        offense           were       between          January           1,      2005      and        December            31,
    2005.        Thus,           if    commission            of    the       crime        took     place         in      2005,       then
    the     maximum              sentence             of    seven        years            under     La.          R. S.     14: 81( C)
    pre -2006            amendment)             is      applicable          to    relator' s            case.            Even      with
    the     guilty          plea         and      the       State' s         reduction            of      the       charge           from
    aggravated                  rape      to       indecent             behavior              with        juveniles,                  the
    sentencing             scheme           for    the       reduced         charge          at    the     time          the        crime
    was     committed              still        controls.               As    such,          relator'        s     twenty -five-
    year        sentence               constitutes            a     violation               of    the        ex        post         facto
    clauses           of        both        the          state      and        federal             constitutions,                     and
    requires vacating the                          sentence         and remanding                  for a new sentence.
    See     State         v.     Babineaux,                2016- 0694 (        La.         4/ 24/ 17),           
    217 So. 3d 329
    per        curiam),              State       v.       Modisette,             50, 846 (        La.       App.         2nd       Cir,
    9/ 28/ 16),           
    207 So. 3d 11
    . 08,      1111- 12.
    COURT       OF APPEAL,              FIRST      CIRCUIT
    c
    DEPUTY          CLERK OF COURT
    FOR    THE     COURT
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2019KW0536

Filed Date: 1/15/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024