Dana Neumann, Individually and on behalf of Joshua Neumann, Justin Neumann and Jesse Neumann v. L&B Transport, L.L.C., Trailer Management International, LLC a/k/a TMI, Inc., Gerardo Arreola, Millennium Transport Unlimited, Inc., The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, ABC Insurance Company, and DEF Insurance Company ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                     STATE OF LOUISIANA
    COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
    DANA NEUMANN,                     INDIVIDUALLY                 AND        ON                                NO.       2019       CW   1505
    BEHALF            OF   JOSHUA           NEUMANN,              JUSTIN
    NEUMANN            AND       JESSE       NEUMANN
    VERSUS
    L& B    TRANSPORT,                 L. L. C.,            TRAILER
    MANAGEMENT                  INTERNATIONAL,                    LLC     A/ K/ A
    TMI,       INC.,         GERARDO             ARREOLA,               MILLENNIUM
    TRANSPORT              UNLIMITED,                  INC.,       THE
    INSURANCE              COMPANY           OF        THE     STATE          OF                                        JAN D 6 2020
    PENNSYLVANIA,                     ABC    INSURANCE                  COMPANY,
    AND     DEF        INSURANCE             COMPANY
    In     Re:             L& B             Transport,                         L. L. C.,                 Trailer                    Management
    International,                     LLC        a/ k/ a         TMI,          Inc.,           Gerardo       Arreola,
    and The           Insurance                  Company of                 the State             of       Pennsylvania
    and          Lexington                       Insurance                   Company,              applying               for
    supervisory                     writs,            22nd             Judicial                 District          Court,
    Parish          of        St.    Tammany,              No.        2014- 13640.
    BEFORE:                WHIPPLE,              C. J.,        GUIDRY AND BURRIS, 1                           JJ.
    WRIT         DENIED.                   See    Herlitz              Construction                  Co.,       Inc.      v.        Hotel
    Investors               of        New    Iberia,               Inc.,           
    396 So. 2d 878
     (      La.       1981) (       per
    curiam).
    vGW
    WJB
    Guidry,            J.,       dissents               and        would           grant      the        writ          application.
    I    would         reverse           the          portion            of    the        district             court'         s   October        30,
    2019         judgment              granting                the       Plaintiffs' "                   Motion           in       Limine        and
    Daubert                Motion           to         Exclude               Evidence               and        Opinions              Regarding
    Alcohol            Testing Results"                        in       part.            The       district             court       abused       its
    discretion                  in      excluding                  the         forensic                 test        results           and   any
    reference                   thereto.                     Louisiana                   Revised               Statutes              32: 663( C)
    provides               that       issuance               of     a    permit           by       the     Department               of    Public
    Safety            and        Corrections                   to        a        certified              laboratory                 makes        all
    laboratory                  forensic              test        results           conducted             on        a    person'      s   blood,
    urine,            or     other          bodily             substance                 by    a    laboratory "                  valid      under
    the        provisions                   of         this        Part,            and         admissible                and        competent
    evidence               of    intoxication                     in     any       court           of    law        or    administrative
    hearing."                    Evidence               of        such        a     permit              was     introduced                at     the
    hearing.                Therefore,                  I    find        that       the        issues          presented            go    to     the
    weight            of    the       evidence               rather           than        its      admissibility                   and    can     be
    adequately explored through                                         cross- examination.
    COUE.::_           APPEAL,              FIRST           CIRCUIT
    JA              Did             wd
    DEPUTY          rL R            OF        COURT
    FOR      THE     COURT
    Judge       William         J.   Burris,          retired,          serving pro            tempore by special                 appointment
    of   the     Louisiana            Supreme         Court.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2019CW1505

Filed Date: 1/6/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/22/2024