State Of Louisiana v. Christopher Joseph Borne ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •  STATE        OF    LOUISIANA                                                                    NO.     2024     KW 0908
    VERSUS
    CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH                   BORNE                                              OCTOBER            16,        2024
    In     Re:          Christopher              Joseph          Borne,                 for
    applying                          supervisory
    writs,           17th         Judicial             District  Court,                         Parish         of
    Lafourche,           No.      619904.
    BEFORE:             GUIDRY,         C. J.,     PENZATO AND              STROMBERG,             JJ.
    WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.                                                   The      trial     court' s
    ruling  denying  relator' s motion  in  limine                                                      is    reversed             in
    part.          With         respect          to      the     charge            of
    pornography               involving
    juveniles,             only,      relator         is       not     prohibited                from  arguing             he    was
    misled        about        the    victim' s          age.    The        age     of      the     performers             is     the
    crucial        element           separating          legal        innocence             from wrongful              conduct
    because non - obscene,
    sexually explicit materials involving persons
    over the age of 17 are protected by the First Amendment.                                                               United
    States        v.     X- Citement          Video,          Inc.,        
    513 U. S. 64
    ,      72- 73,        
    115 S. Ct. 464
    ,      469,       
    130 L. Ed. 2d 372
     (     1994) .          Thus,          La.     R. S.     14: 81. 1( D) (       1)
    must be severed from the remainder of the statute to prevent the
    State         from     being        relieved          of
    proving scienter      as   to   minority.
    See    La.     R. S.       24: 175;      State       v.     Cinel, 94- 0942 ( La.    11/ 30/ 94), 
    646 So. 2d 309
    ,      317,      cert.       denied,         
    516 U. S. 881
    ,         
    116 S. Ct. 215
    ,        
    133 L. Ed. 2d 146
     (        1995).            Accordingly,                     because              there     is          no
    valid provision                to    the       contrary           in   La.      R. S.        14: 81. 1,     mistake            of
    fact,
    which precludes the presence of any mental element required
    in pornography  involving          juveniles, including scienter  as   to
    minority, is a defense to                            prosecution               for      that     crime.          La.        R. S.
    14: 16.       In    all     other     respects,            the writ application is denied.
    JMG
    ARP
    TPS
    URT        OF APPEAL,          FIRST       CIRCUIT
    PUTY CLERK OF COURT
    FOR THE      COURT
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2024KW0908

Filed Date: 10/16/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2024