Hockaday v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. ( 2022 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA EDISON W. HOCKADAY, JR. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 17-3281 BP EXPLORATION & SECTION M (4) PRODUCTION INC., et al. ORDER & REASONS Before the Court is a Daubert motion in limine to exclude the general causation opinions of plaintiff’s medical expert Dr. Jerald Cook filed by defendants BP Exploration & Production Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c., Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Transocean Holdings LLC, Transocean Deepwater, Inc., and Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”).1 Plaintiff Edison W. Hockaday, Jr. responds in opposition.2 Also before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in which they argue that the case should be dismissed because Hockaday cannot prove general causation without Cook’s opinions.3 Hockaday responds in opposition.4 Defendants’ motions here are nearly identical to those filed by Defendants, and granted by this Court, in other B3 cases. See, e.g., Carpenter v. BP Expl. & Prod., Inc., 2022 WL 2757416 (E.D. La. July 14, 2022); Johns v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 1811088 (E.D. La. June 2, 2022); Johnson v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 1811090 (E.D. La. June 2, 2022); Macon v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 1811135 (E.D. La. June 2, 2022); Murray v. BP Expl. & Prod. 1 R. Doc. 53. 2 R. Doc. 56. 3 R. Doc. 54. 4 R. Doc. 55. Inc., 2022 WL 1811138 (E.D. La. June 2, 2022); Street v. BP Expl. & Prod. Inc., 2022 WL 1811144 (E.D. La. June 2, 2022). Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Orders & Reasons issued in those cases, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Daubert motion to exclude Cook (R. Doc. 53) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (R. Doc. 54) is GRANTED, and Hockaday’s claims against them are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 30th day of August, 2022. ________________________________ BARRY W. ASHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE