Sampay v. Terrebonne Parish 32nd Judicial Court ( 2022 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA PAUL ANTHONY SAMPAY CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 22-1173 TERREBONNE PARISH 32ND SECTION: D (2) JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, ET AL. ORDER & REASONS The Court, having considered Plaintiff Paul Anthony Sampay’s Motion for Time Extension! and Motion to Amend Current Defendants and Change the Defendant to State of Louisiana,” the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge,? and the failure of the Plaintiff to file any objection to the Report and Recommendation,‘ hereby approves the Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. In doing so, the Court notes that it has construed Plaintiffs pro se pleading liberally.® IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions (R. Docs. 11 and 12), construed as motions to reopen under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and to amend pleading under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), are DENIED, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. New Orleans, Louisiana, December 12, 2022. Vth WENDY B./VITTER United States District Judge Doce. 11. 2R. Doe. 12. Doe. 15. 4 Objections were due December 1, 2022. Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court has allowed additional time for objections. None have been filed as of the date of this Order. 5 See Coleman v. United States, 912 F.3d 824, 828 (5th Cir. 2019).