Ensley v. Foster ( 2023 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MARK ENSLEY CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 22-4649 MICHELLE FOSTER, ET AL. SECTION: D (1) ORDER & REASONS The Court, having considered Plaintiff Mark Ensley’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge,” and the failure of the Plaintiff to file any objection to the Report and Recommendation,? hereby approves the Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. In doing so, the Court notes that it has construed Plaintiff Mark Ensley’s pro se pleading liberally.4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims alleged in the Complaint® against Defendants, Michelle Foster, New Orleans Metropolitan Crime Commission, and Rafael Goyeneche, IJ, are DISMISSED, without prejudice, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation. New Orleans, Louisiana, February 1, 20238. United States District Judge 2 Doe. 7. 3 Objections were due January 11, 2023. Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court has allowed additional time for objections. None have been filed as of the date of this Order. : eenan v. United States, 912 F.3d 824, 828 (5th Cir. 2019).