Savoie v. Dove ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DAVID PAUL SAVOIE CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 23-799 GARDEN DOVE, JR., ET AL. SECTION: D (2) ORDER AND REASONS The Court, having considered Plaintiff David Paul Savoie’s Complaint,1 the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge,2 and the failure of the Plaintiff to file any objection to the Report and Recommendation,3 and further having determined that the Magistrate Judge’s findings are not clearly erroneous,4 hereby approves the Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. In doing so, the Court notes that it has construed Plaintiff David Paul Savoie’s pro se pleading liberally.5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims alleged in his Complaint6 against Defendants Garden Dove, Jr., South Louisiana Medical ER, South Central Louisiana SCLHSA Terrebonne BHC, and Southeast Neuroscience Center are 1 R. Doc. 4. 2 R. Doc. 10. 3 Objections were due June 13, 2023. Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court has allowed additional time for objections. None have been filed as of the date of this Order. 4 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). 5 See Coleman v. United States, 912 F.3d 824, 828 (5th Cir. 2019). 6 R. Doc. 4. DISMISSED, without prejudice, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, for the sound reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation of May 30, 2023. New Orleans, Louisiana, June 22, 2023. eds & Vottic WENDY VITTER United States District Judge

Document Info

Docket Number: 2:23-cv-00799

Filed Date: 6/22/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/22/2024