Frasier v. Lemmon ( 2023 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CHRISTOPHER BLAKE FRASIER CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 23-1525 LAUREN LEMMON, ET AL. SECTION “R” (5) ORDER Plaintiff Christopher Blake Frasier, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendants violated his rights in court.1 On June 20, 2023, Magistrate Judge Michael B. North issued a Report & Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the Court dismiss plaintiff’s complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted.2 Plaintiff did not object to the R&R. Therefore, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note (1983) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). The Court finds no clear error. 1 R. Doc. 5. 2 R. Doc. 15. Accordingly, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge North’s R&R as its opinion. Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 17th day of July, 2023. derek Vortec SARAH S. VANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE