Ducre v. Rolling Frito-Lay Pepsico ( 2023 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JADE DUCRE CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 22-5241 ROLLING FRITO-LAY PEPSICO SECTION “R” (4) ORDER Plaintiff Jade Ducre, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, alleging discrimination on the basis of race, color, and gender, as well as retaliation.1 On July 12, 2023, Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby issued a Report & Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the Court dismiss plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for her failure to prosecute.2 Plaintiff did not object to the R&R. Therefore, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note (1983) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself 1 R. Doc. 1. 2 R. Doc. 20. that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). The Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Roby’s R&R as its opinion. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 28th day of July, 2023. derek Veree SARAH S. VANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE