- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MELVIN BURTON CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 21-0239 JEFF LANDRY, WARDEN SECTION: AL@(5) CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY The Court recently issued a final order in connection with the above-captioned habeas corpus proceeding, in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a state court. R. Doc. 11. After considering the record and the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b)(1), the Court finds that a certificate of appealability shall not issue. A certificate of appealability will be issued “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see Miller–El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 330 (2003); Foster v. Quarterman, 466 F.3d 359, 364 (5th Cir. 2006). The applicant makes a substantial showing if it is demonstrated “that jurists of reason could debate the propriety of the district court's assessment of his constitutional claims or conclude that his claims ‘are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.’” United States v. Wainwright, 237 Fed. App'x 913, 914 (5th Cir.2007) (quoting Miller–El, 537 U.S. at 327); see Foster, 466 F.3d at 364. The Court adopted the U.S. Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition be dismissed with prejudice because it is time-barred. R. Doc. 10. Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing that he has been denied a constitutional right, and he has failed to demonstrate that the issue could be resolved differently. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that a certificate of appealability SHALL NOT BE ISSUED. New Orleans, Louisiana, this 9th day of June, 2021. ELDON E. FALLON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Document Info
Docket Number: 2:21-cv-00239
Filed Date: 6/9/2021
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/22/2024