Matthews v. Williams ( 2022 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA PERCELL JAMES MATTHEWS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 21-1233 YOLANDA WILLIAMS SECTION “R” (3) ORDER Plaintiff Percell James Matthews brings this action pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 On January 4, 2022, Magistrate Judge Dana M. Douglas issued a Report & Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.2 No party objected to the R&R. Therefore, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note (1983) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). The Court finds no clear error. 1 R. Doc. 6. 2 R. Doc. 15. Accordingly, the Court adopts Magistrate Douglas’s R&R as its opinion. Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. New Orleans, Louisiana, this__16th_ day of February, 2022. bernk Vaoree SARAH S. VANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE