Williams v. Spafford , 25 Mass. 256 ( 1829 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The indigo was sold by sample ; and that is a warranty that the bulk is of the same kind and quality with the sample.1

    Defendant defaulted.

    See Long on Sales, (Rand’s edit.) 191,192; Gallagher v. Waring, 9 Wendell, 20; Beebe v. Robert, 12 Wendell, 413; Andrews v. Kneeland, 6 Cowen, 354; Boorman v. Johnson, 12 Wendell, 566; Chitty on Contr. (4th Am. edit.) 360.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 25 Mass. 256

Filed Date: 6/27/1829

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/25/2022