-
Field, J. The ruling of the court was correct. If the plaintiff was not in possession “ except through his tenants,” who “ were then in actual possession,” and the acts of the defendant were an injury to the reversion, the declaration should have so alleged the facts. Woodman v. Francis, 14 Allen, 198. Gooding v. Shea, 103 Mass. 360. Dearborn v. Wellman, 130 Mass. 238.
Exceptions overruled.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 143 Mass. 409
Judges: Field
Filed Date: 1/10/1887
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/25/2022