-
Holmes, J. The fact that the officer had a document with him when he made the arrest was matter in pais, and ordinarily would be testified to, as it was in this case, by words identifying the instrument. If the identification of it by paroi as a capias, and the implication that it ran against the defendant, in extreme strictness, could have been objected to as reciting the contents of the writ, no such objection was taken, and the case could not be taken from the jury at a later stage because the capias was not produced. Niles v. Patch, 13 Gray, 254, 259.
Exceptions overruled.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 158 Mass. 163
Judges: Holmes
Filed Date: 2/28/1893
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/25/2022