-
In this action of tort the plaintiff claims for personal injuries received in a flash fire caused by the malfunction of a grill in the Jordan Marsh Company store in Boston, stating that the defendant undertook to repair the grill and its wiring system and did so negligently. We do not discuss the issues of negligence and the defence raised under G. L. c. 152, §§15 and 18, for the matter can be disposed of on the defendant’s contention that the individuals who undertook the repairs were lent servants to Jordan Marsh Company. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff (Cannon v. Crowley, 318 Mass 373, 374), it could have been found that the individuals who did the electrical work were employees of the defendant and paid by it although they worked steadily at Jordan Marsh Company. The two individual electricians took orders directly from the defendant’s foreman but the foreman in turn took his orders directly from an electrician in the employ of Jordan Marsh Company. In this instance the employees did not continue liable to the direction and control of the defendant but were subject to that of Jordan Marsh Company to which they were lent. Galloway’s Case, 354 Mass. 427, 430. See Coughlan v. Cambridge, 166 Mass. 268, 277; Langevin’s Case, 326 Mass. 43, 47. The record makes it clear that the employees who accomplished the repairs were lent employees, and since there was no contradictory evidence a verdict should have been directed for the defendant.
Exceptions sustained.
Judgment for the defendant.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 357 Mass. 780, 260 N.E.2d 174
Filed Date: 6/9/1970
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024