THANH C. TRAN v. LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP, INC. & Others. ( 2023 )

decision was rendered it was an abuse of discretion. Conclusion. The orders allowing the motion to withdraw and denying the motions for reconsideration are affirmed.4 So ordered. By the Court (Green, C.J., Rubin & Hand, JJ.5), Clerk Entered: October 16, 2023. 4 A single justice allowed the late filing of the notice of appeal in this case. The firm sought review of that order before a second single justice. That second single justice treated it as notice of cross appeal, and permitted the firm to raise its claim with respect to the first single justice order in its brief before us. Although, therefore, that cross appeal is properly before us, as we read the firm's brief it asks us to affirm the order allowing the motion to withdraw and, only alternatively, to act on its cross appeal. As we are affirming the order allowing the motion to withdraw, the order of the single justice will therefore also be affirmed. The appellant Tran has also filed two notices of appeal from denials of motions for reconsideration of the order allowing the motion to withdraw. In light of our conclusion on the merits of the allowance of the motion to withdraw, those denials are affirmed. 5 The panelists are listed in order of seniority. 11