-
The court was of opinion, that the bond, on which the action was brought, could not be made to embrace any ether judgment than the one it recited; and as the judgment admitted by the case stated to have been obtained by the appellant against Davis, was rendered at April term 1801, of the general court, and the ene recited in the bond is of September term 1801, they thought the judgment below ought to be affirmed.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 5 H. & J. 61
Judges: Buchanan, Dorsey, Johnson, Martin
Filed Date: 6/15/1820
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024