State v. Buck , 46 Me. 531 ( 1859 )


Menu:
  • The Court

    held, that, notwithstanding only the collective value of the property alleged to have been stolen is stated in the indictment, yet, if the jury find the defendant guilty of stealing a part only of the property, and, in their verdict, *532state the value of the articles so stolen by him, judgment may be well rendered upon such verdict.

    Tenney, C. J., and Appleton, Cutting, May, Davis, and Kent, J. J., concurred.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 46 Me. 531

Judges: Appleton, Cutting, Davis, Kent, Tenney

Filed Date: 7/1/1859

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/10/2024