-
This was an action of tort to recover damages alleged to have been caused the plaintiff’s horse by the defendant’s dog. The verdict was in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $200.30. The case is before this court on motion. The issues were simply of fact.
A careful study of the evidence fails to convince the court that the verdict was manifestly wrong. The entry must therefore be,
Motion overruled.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 114 Me. 554, 96 A. 836, 1916 Me. LEXIS 163
Filed Date: 3/25/1916
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/10/2024