-
This is an action of assumpsit for installing a furnace in the house of the defendant.
The jury found for the defendant. A careful reading of the testimony shows that the jury was well warranted in finding the conclusion at which they arrived.
As the case presents a pure question of fact, an analysis or discussion of the testimony would be without profit to the parties or as a precedent. Motion overruled.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 121 Me. 572, 115 A. 925, 1921 Me. LEXIS 139
Filed Date: 12/17/1921
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/10/2024