People of Michigan v. Jonathon Alan Jaszczolt ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    December 27, 2017                                                                                    Stephen J. Markman,
    Chief Justice
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    155377                                                                                                  David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    Kurtis T. Wilder
    Elizabeth T. Clement,
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                                    Justices
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v                                                                 SC: 155377
    COA: 336131
    Oakland CC: 2014-249810-FH
    JONATHON ALAN JASZCZOLT,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 2, 2017
    order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of
    granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for
    consideration as on leave granted. On remand, while retaining jurisdiction, the Court of
    Appeals shall remand this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for further proceedings. The
    circuit court’s December 1, 2016 decision is inadequate for appellate review because it
    fails to make any findings of fact or conclusions of law that relate to the three charges
    against the defendant or to draw any conclusions regarding application of the retroactive
    amendments to the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA), MCL 333.26421 et seq.,
    in 
    2016 PA 281-283
    to any of the defendant’s marijuana-related conduct, including but
    not limited to his claim that he planned to transfer a portion of the marijuana in his
    possession to a third-party to make a “marihuana-infused product.” See 
    2016 PA 283
    ,
    MCL 333.26423(f); 
    2016 PA 281
    , § 102(k). A single act by the defendant that is outside
    the parameters of the MMMA does not per se taint all of the defendant’s marijuana-
    related conduct. People v Hartwick, 
    498 Mich. 192
    , 241-242 (2015). The circuit court
    shall forward its findings and conclusions to the Court of Appeals, which shall resolve
    the issues presented by the defendant.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    December 27, 2017
    s1218
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 155377

Filed Date: 12/27/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/28/2017