Bank of New York Mellon v. Jaafar ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    July 2, 2015                                                                                         Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    Stephen J. Markman
    Mary Beth Kelly
    150957                                                                                                    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein,
    BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, f/k/a BANK                                                                                 Justices
    OF NEW YORK, as Trustee for the Certificate
    Holders of CWABS, INC., ASSET-BACKED
    CERTIFICATES SERIES 2003-3,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v                                                                 SC: 150957
    COA: 316521
    Wayne CC: 11-008424-CH
    JAAFAR K. JAAFAR and BADIA JAAFAR,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 23, 2014
    judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in
    lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
    An offer “is the manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to
    justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will
    conclude it.” See Eerdmans v Maki, 
    226 Mich App 360
    , 364 (1997). Here, and contrary
    to the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the January 20, 2012 e-mail from plaintiff’s
    counsel to defendants’ counsel did not constitute an offer to settle this case. Instead, this
    e-mail inquired whether defendants would present an offer at some point in the future,
    which they did, through a subsequent e-mail by their counsel. Defendants’ counsel
    confirmed that this subsequent e-mail was an offer by later inquiring whether plaintiff
    had accepted their offer. For these reasons, and for the reasons stated by the Court of
    Appeals’ dissenting opinion, no enforceable settlement agreement existed to bind the
    parties in this case. We REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for further
    proceedings not inconsistent with this order.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    July 2, 2015
    s0630
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 150957; Court of Appeals 316521

Filed Date: 7/2/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/10/2024