In Re Attorney Fees of Ujlaky , 498 Mich. 890 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                         Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    September 30, 2015                                                                                    Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    150887                                                                                                Stephen J. Markman
    Mary Beth Kelly
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    In re Attorney Fees of JOHN W. UJLAKY                                                                Richard H. Bernstein,
    Justices
    ____________________________________
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v                                                                  SC: 150887
    COA: 316494
    Kent CC: 11-002833-FC
    SHAWN DOUGLAS SIMPSON,
    Defendant,
    and
    JOHN W. UJLAKY,
    Appellant.
    _____________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2014
    judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in
    lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals as
    to Docket No. 316494, and we REMAND this case to the Kent Circuit Court for a
    determination of the reasonableness of the attorney fees requested. The trial court
    applied the county’s fee schedule, which capped compensation for plea cases at $660, but
    did not address at all the reasonableness of the fee in relation to the actual services
    rendered, as itemized by the appellant. See In re Recorder’s Court Bar Ass’n, 
    443 Mich. 110
    , 131 (1993). Although the expenditure of any amount of time beyond that
    contemplated by the schedule for the typical case does not, ipso facto, warrant extra fees,
    spending a significant but reasonable number of hours beyond the norm may. On
    remand, the trial court shall either award the requested fees, or articulate on the record its
    basis for concluding that such fees are not reasonable. See, e.g., In re Attorney Fees of
    Mullkoff, 
    176 Mich. App. 82
    , 85-88 (1989), and In re Attorney Fees of Jamnik, 176 Mich
    App 827, 831 (1989).
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    September 30, 2015
    a0930
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 150887; Court of Appeals 316494

Citation Numbers: 498 Mich. 890

Filed Date: 9/30/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024