People of Michigan v. Adam Donald Lutz ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                         Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    October 7, 2016                                                                                       Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    153463 & (41)(42)                                                                                     Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    Joan L. Larsen,
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                                     Justices
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v                                                                  SC: 153463
    COA: 324193
    Oakland CC: 2013-248152-FC
    ADAM DONALD LUTZ,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the motion to permit additional ground for appeal is
    GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the February 25, 2016 judgment of the
    Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting
    leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court to determine
    whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the
    sentencing procedure described in People v Lockridge, 
    498 Mich 358
     (2015). On
    remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If
    the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the
    unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If,
    however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence
    absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant.
    In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the
    remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to amend
    and clarify the record is DENIED.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    October 7, 2016
    p1004
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 153463

Filed Date: 10/7/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/8/2016