People of Michigan v. Larry Steven King ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    June 22, 2011                                                                                        Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    142850                                                                                               Michael F. Cavanagh
    Marilyn Kelly
    Stephen J. Markman
    Diane M. Hathaway
    Mary Beth Kelly
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                         Brian K. Zahra,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                                       Justices
    v                                                                 SC: 142850
    COA: 294682
    Shiawassee CC: 09-008600-FH
    LARRY STEVEN KING,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 3, 2011
    judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall
    address: (1) whether the defendant was immune from arrest and prosecution for
    manufacturing marijuana under § 4(a) and (d) of the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act,
    MCL 333.26424(a), (d), where he possessed a valid registry identification card and he
    was in possession of an amount of marijuana that did not exceed the amount allowed
    under the act; (2) whether the presumption under § 4(d) was rebutted by evidence that the
    defendant did not keep his 12 marijuana plants in an “enclosed, locked facility” under
    § 4(a), as defined in § 3(c), MCL 333.26423(c); (3) if (2) is answered in the affirmative,
    whether the defendant may independently assert an affirmative defense under § 8(a),
    MCL 333.26428(a); and (4) whether the “[e]xcept as provided in section 7” language in
    § 8(a) required the defendant to fulfill all of the conditions set forth in § 4 in order to
    have a valid affirmative defense under § 8(a).
    The Attorney General, the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan, and the
    Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae.
    Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this
    case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
    I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    June 22, 2011                       _________________________________________
    y0615                                                               Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 142850

Filed Date: 6/22/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014