People of Michigan v. Kimberly Ann Arnone ( 2007 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    June 20, 2007                                                                                          Clifford W. Taylor,
    Chief Justice
    131902 & (17) (18)                                                                                   Michael F. Cavanagh
    Elizabeth A. Weaver
    Marilyn Kelly
    Maura D. Corrigan
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                     Robert P. Young, Jr.
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                        Stephen J. Markman,
    Justices
    v                                                                 SC: 131902
    COA: 271028
    Monroe CC: 05-034540-FH
    KIMBERLY ANN ARNONE,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    By order of March 30, 2007, the prosecuting attorney and the Attorney General
    were directed to answer the application for leave to appeal the August 7, 2006 order of
    the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the answer having been received, the
    application for leave to appeal is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in
    lieu of granting leave to appeal, we GRANT the defendant’s motion for extension of time
    to file reply, and we VACATE that portion of the sentence of the Monroe Circuit Court
    that ordered the defendant to pay attorney fees, and we REMAND this case to the trial
    court for a decision on attorney fees that considers the defendant’s ability to pay now and
    in the future. See People v Dunbar, 
    264 Mich App 240
    , 252-256 (2004). At the trial
    court’s discretion, the decision may be made based on the record without the need for a
    formal evidentiary hearing. If the court decides to order the defendant to pay attorney
    fees, it shall do so in a separate order, and not the judgment of sentence. 
    Id. at 256
    ;
    People v Nowicki, 
    213 Mich App 383
    , 386-388 (1995). In all other respects, leave to
    appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented
    should be reviewed by this Court.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    June 20, 2007                       _________________________________________
    s0613                                                                 Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 131902

Filed Date: 6/20/2007

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2014