Dorothy Small v. Stephen T Wysong Md ( 2008 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    May 2, 2008                                                                                            Clifford W. Taylor,
    Chief Justice
    135512                                                                                               Michael F. Cavanagh
    Elizabeth A. Weaver
    DOROTHY SMALL,                                                                                              Marilyn Kelly
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                           Maura D. Corrigan
    v                                                                 SC: 135512                         Robert P. Young, Jr.
    COA: 275332                        Stephen J. Markman,
    Justices
    Van Buren CC: 05-054407-NH
    STEPHEN T. WYSONG, M.D. and
    HEALTHCARE MIDWEST,
    Defendants-Appellants,
    and
    SOUTH HAVEN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 13, 2007
    judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not
    persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the
    completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.
    MARKMAN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part and states as follows:
    Although I would deny leave to appeal with regard to the characterization by the
    Court of Appeals of plaintiff’s two other claims, I believe that the court erred in
    characterizing as an ordinary-negligence claim plaintiff's claim that an x-ray should have
    been conducted following her appendectomy and before her incision was closed.
    Because this seems to me a matter significantly beyond common knowledge, Bryant v
    Oakpointe Villa Nursing Ctr, Inc, 
    471 Mich 411
     (2004), I believe that this claim sounds
    in medical malpractice.
    YOUNG, J., dissents and states as follows:
    For the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion, I would reverse
    the Court of Appeals judgment in part and affirm the trial court’s ruling that plaintiff’s
    complaint sounded in medical malpractice rather than ordinary negligence.
    CORRIGAN, J., joins the statement of YOUNG, J.
    I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    May 2, 2008                         _________________________________________
    d0429                                                               Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 135512

Filed Date: 5/2/2008

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2014