People of Michigan v. Ronald Lee Jex ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    July 15, 2011                                                                                        Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    143091 & (106)                                                                                       Michael F. Cavanagh
    Marilyn Kelly
    Stephen J. Markman
    Diane M. Hathaway
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                         Mary Beth Kelly
    Plaintiff-Appellant,                                                                           Brian K. Zahra,
    Justices
    v                                                                 SC: 143091
    COA: 295825
    Calhoun CC: 2004-003072-FH
    RONALD LEE JEX,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.
    The application for leave to appeal the April 28, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals
    is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we
    REVERSE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment holding that the defendant asserted
    a claim of jurisdictional defect for which he need not demonstrate cause or prejudice.
    Where the defendant pleaded no contest to home invasion, and agreed as part of the
    factual basis for his plea that he entered the dwelling without permission, his current
    claim that he was a co-lessee of the premises and that he did not need permission to enter
    the dwelling does not establish a potential jurisdictional defect. The defendant’s newly
    asserted defense could only negate one element of the crime; it would not implicate the
    very authority of the state to charge him or bring him to trial. People v New, 
    427 Mich 482
    , 491 (1986). Although the Court of Appeals correctly held that a defendant’s claim
    that his plea was not supported by an adequate factual basis is not waived by a no contest
    plea, People v Mitchell, 
    431 Mich 744
    , 749-750 (1988), in this instance the defendant
    provided an adequate factual basis for his plea at the time he pleaded no contest. He
    therefore has the burden to establish both good cause for his failure to raise his grounds
    for relief on appeal, and actual prejudice. MCR 6.508(D)(3)(a), (b). We REMAND this
    case to the Court of Appeals for it to determine whether the defendant has satisfied that
    burden.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    July 15, 2011                       _________________________________________
    d0712                                                                 Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 143091

Filed Date: 7/15/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2014