People of Michigan v. Timothy Wade Horton ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    December 9, 2015                                                                                     Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    150815                                                                                               Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                          Joan L. Larsen,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                                       Justices
    v                                                                 SC: 150815
    COA: 324071
    Oakland CC: 2013-247924-FH
    TIMOTHY WADE HORTON,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 19, 2014
    order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall
    include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the defendant’s unconditional no
    contest plea waived his claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel based on trial
    counsel’s failure to make a motion to dismiss for a 180-day rule violation, MCL 780.131
    and 780.133, in light of People v Lown, 
    488 Mich 242
    , 267-270 (2011), or for
    constitutional speedy trial violations; (2) whether the defendant’s unconditional no
    contest plea waived his claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel for trial counsel’s
    failure to inform the defendant that an unconditional no contest plea would waive his
    right to appeal on the basis of a 180-day rule violation or constitutional speedy trial
    violations; and (3) whether trial counsel’s failure to inform the defendant that his
    unconditional no contest plea would waive his right to appeal on the basis of a 180-day
    rule violation and constitutional speedy trial violation made defendant’s plea unknowing
    and involuntary. We further ORDER the Oakland Circuit Court, in accordance with
    Administrative Order 2003-03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so,
    to appoint the State Appellate Defender Office to represent the defendant in this Court.
    The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys
    Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups
    interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court
    for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    December 9, 2015
    t1202
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 150815

Filed Date: 12/9/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/11/2015