People of Michigan v. Steven Anthony Fisher ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    October 30, 2019                                                                                  Bridget M. McCormack,
    Chief Justice
    157934(45)                                                                                              David F. Viviano,
    Chief Justice Pro Tem
    Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                     Richard H. Bernstein
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                        Elizabeth T. Clement
    Megan K. Cavanagh,
    Justices
    v                                                                 SC: 157934
    COA: 336902
    Isabella CC: 2016-000801-FH
    STEVEN ANTHONY FISHER,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _____________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the motion to deem the late-filed application for leave to
    appeal timely is DENIED. Under some circumstances, the Court may “enter an order
    permitting a document to be deemed filed nunc pro tunc on the date of the unsuccessful
    transmission.” Administrative Order 2014-23, 
    497 Mich. cxxviii
    (2014). But such relief is
    warranted only where the moving party proves “to the court’s satisfaction that . . . the
    transmission failed because of the failure of the TrueFiling system to process the electronic
    document or because of the court’s computer system’s failure to receive the document.”
    
    Id. at cxxix.
    A contemporaneous review of the TrueFiling system and the Court’s computer
    system showed that both were operational at the time of the defendant’s transmission. The
    defendant’s assertions and speculations to the contrary do not prove to the Court’s
    satisfaction that either the TrueFiling system or the Court’s computer system caused an
    unsuccessful transmission. Accordingly, the defendant is not entitled to the relief
    requested.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    October 30, 2019
    b1023
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 157934

Filed Date: 10/30/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2019