People of Michigan v. Jeffrey Ryan Gunnells ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                         Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    November 25, 2015                                                                                     Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    151096                                                                                                Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                           Joan L. Larsen,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                                        Justices
    v                                                                  SC: 151096
    COA: 317326
    Wayne CC: 12-011108-FC
    JEFFREY RYAN GUNNELLS,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 13, 2014
    judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in
    lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part the judgment of the Court of
    Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court to determine whether
    the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing
    procedure described in People v Lockridge, 
    498 Mich. 358
    (2015). On remand, the trial
    court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court
    determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional
    constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial
    court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the
    unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other
    respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining
    questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    November 25, 2015
    t1118
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 151096

Filed Date: 11/25/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/26/2015