People of Michigan v. Dawn Marie Dixon-Bey , 910 N.W.2d 303 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                           Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    May 4, 2018                                                                           Stephen J. Markman,
    Chief Justice
    156746                                                                                      Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    Kurtis T. Wilder
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                     Elizabeth T. Clement,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,                                                                        Justices
    v                                                          SC: 156746
    COA: 331499
    Jackson CC: 15-004596-FC
    DAWN MARIE DIXON-BEY,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    _____________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 26, 2017
    judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral
    argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1).
    The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this
    order, addressing: (1) to what extent the sentencing guidelines should be considered to
    determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in applying the principle of
    proportionality under People v Steanhouse, 
    500 Mich. 453
    (2017); and (2) whether, when
    a jury convicted the defendant of second-degree murder, the trial court abused its
    discretion in applying the principle of proportionality if it either (a) sentenced the
    defendant according to an independent finding that she committed first-degree murder; or
    (b) departed upward from the sentencing guidelines for second-degree murder based on
    facts established by a preponderance of the evidence that the jury did not find were
    established beyond a reasonable doubt. See MCL 777.36(2)(a); People v Ewing (After
    Remand), 
    435 Mich. 443
    (1990); People v Milbourn, 
    435 Mich. 630
    , 654 (1990).
    In addition to the brief, the appellant shall electronically file an appendix
    conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must provide the
    appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a
    supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The
    appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use
    of the appendix filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant
    2
    within 14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit
    mere restatements of their application papers.
    We further direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case for the same
    future session of this Court when it will hear oral argument in People v Beck (Docket No.
    152934).
    The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense
    Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups
    interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court
    for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    May 4, 2018
    a0501
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SC: 156746; COA: 331499

Citation Numbers: 910 N.W.2d 303

Filed Date: 5/4/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024