People v. Emmanuel Brown , 499 Mich. 865 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                         Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    March 8, 2016                                                                                         Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    148551 & (56)                                                                                         Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                           Joan L. Larsen,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                                        Justices
    v                                                                  SC: 148551
    COA: 310550
    Branch CC: 10-109467-FC
    JAMES CHARLES WILCOX,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    By order of September 5, 2014, the application for leave to appeal the November
    26, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in
    People v Lockridge (Docket No. 149073). On order of the Court, the case having been
    decided on July 29, 2015, 
    498 Mich 358
     (2015), the application is again considered.
    Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part
    the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the Branch Circuit
    Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence
    under the sentencing procedure described in Lockridge. On remand, the trial court shall
    follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines
    that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its
    discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines
    that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint
    on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is
    DENIED because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be
    reviewed by this Court. The motion to hold application in abeyance is DENIED as moot.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    March 8, 2016
    t0229
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 148551

Citation Numbers: 499 Mich. 865

Filed Date: 3/8/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/10/2024