People of Michigan v. Gabino Xiloj-Perez ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    December 20, 2017                                                                                    Stephen J. Markman,
    Chief Justice
    155775                                                                                                    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    Kurtis T. Wilder
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                   Elizabeth T. Clement,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                                       Justices
    v                                                                 SC: 155775
    COA: 336849
    Kent CC: 16-002253-FC
    GABINO XILOJ-PEREZ,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2017 order
    of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of
    granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Kent Circuit Court to determine
    whether the defendant provided a completed Notice of Right to Appellate Review and
    Request for Appointment of Attorney form to a deputy to return to the court pursuant to
    MCR 6.425(F)(3). If the defendant did so, the trial court shall appoint appellate counsel
    to represent the defendant. See Halbert v Michigan, 
    545 U.S. 605
    ; 
    125 S. Ct. 2582
    ; 162 L
    Ed 2d 552 (2005). Substitute appellate counsel, once appointed, may file an application
    for leave to appeal in the Court of Appeals for consideration under the standard for direct
    appeals, and/or any appropriate postconviction motions in the circuit court, within six
    months of the date of the circuit court’s order appointing counsel. If the court finds that
    the defendant did not make a timely effort to request appellate counsel, it shall exercise
    its discretion in deciding whether to appoint appellate counsel.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    December 20, 2017
    p1213
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 155775

Filed Date: 12/20/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/21/2017