People of Michigan v. Walter Jerome Demaray ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    July 26, 2016                                                                                        Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    148841                                                                                            Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    Joan L. Larsen,
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                                    Justices
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v                                                                 SC: 148841
    COA: 319352
    Emmet CC: 12-003758-FH
    WALTER JEROME DEMARAY,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ____________________________________/
    By order of February 3, 2015, the application for leave to appeal the January 16,
    2014 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People
    v Lockridge (Docket No. 149073). On order of the Court, the case having been decided
    on July 29, 2015, 
    498 Mich. 358
    (2015), the application is again considered. Pursuant to
    MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the
    Emmet Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially
    different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in Lockridge. On remand,
    the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial
    court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the
    unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If,
    however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence
    absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant.
    On remand, the Emmet Circuit Court shall also consider the defendant’s issue regarding
    the assessment of a payment to the “Victims Restitution Fund.” In all other respects,
    leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions
    presented should be reviewed by this Court.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    July 26, 2016
    a0718
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 148841

Filed Date: 7/26/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/28/2016