People of Michigan v. Jermaine Terrell Jackson ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                         Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    November 27, 2019                                                                                  Bridget M. McCormack,
    Chief Justice
    157164                                                                                                   David F. Viviano,
    Chief Justice Pro Tem
    Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                      Richard H. Bernstein
    Plaintiff-Appellant,                                                                        Elizabeth T. Clement
    Megan K. Cavanagh,
    Justices
    v                                                                  SC: 157164
    COA: 333722
    Monroe CC: 15-242179-FC
    JERMAINE TERRELL JACKSON,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    _____________________________________/
    By order of June 20, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the December 12,
    2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in
    People v Dixon-Bey (Docket No. 156746). On order of the Court, leave to appeal having
    been denied in Dixon-Bey on July 29, 2019, 504 Mich ___ (2019), the application is again
    considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we
    REVERSE the Court of Appeals judgment holding that the trial court failed to adequately
    support its departure sentence, and remanding this case to the trial court for resentencing.
    The Court of Appeals clearly erred in concluding that the trial court’s justifications for the
    departure were entirely encapsulated by the offense variables. Taken as a whole, the trial
    court’s justifications were addressed not only to the seriousness of the offense, but also to
    the danger posed by this particular offender, who intentionally and needlessly created an
    exceptionally dangerous situation and whose criminal behavior was escalating. The Court
    of Appeals failed to note and account for the trial court’s express statement that the
    departure was a fair and proportionate sentence for the protection of society in these
    circumstances. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by violating the principle of
    proportionality when it imposed a modest departure for the reasons provided.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    November 27, 2019
    b1120
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 157164

Filed Date: 11/27/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/28/2019