People of Michigan v. Deyonta Dewayne Quinn ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                         Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    September 27, 2016                                                                                    Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    149860                                                                                             Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                           Joan L. Larsen,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                                        Justices
    v                                                                  SC: 149860
    COA: 315288
    Muskegon CC: 10-060038-FC
    DEYONTA DEWAYNE QUINN,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    By order of March 3, 2015, the application for leave to appeal the June 26, 2014
    judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v
    Lockridge (Docket No. 149073). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on
    July 29, 2015, 
    498 Mich. 358
    (2015), the application is again considered. Pursuant to
    MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part the judgment
    of the Court of Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the Muskegon Circuit Court to
    determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under
    the sentencing procedure described in Lockridge. On remand, the trial court shall follow
    the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it
    would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its
    discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines
    that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint
    on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is
    DENIED because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be
    reviewed by this Court.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    September 27, 2016
    d0919
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 149860

Filed Date: 9/27/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/28/2016