People of Michigan v. Erik Paul Gutierrez ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                         Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    September 27, 2016                                                                                    Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    149647                                                                                             Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                           Joan L. Larsen,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                                        Justices
    v                                                                  SC: 149647
    COA: 315236
    St. Joseph CC: 12-017655-FH
    ERIK PAUL GUTIERREZ,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    By order of November 25, 2014, the application for leave to appeal the May 22,
    2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in
    People v Lockridge (Docket No. 149073). On order of the Court, the case having been
    decided on July 29, 2015, 
    498 Mich 358
     (2015), the application is again considered.
    Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part
    the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the St. Joseph
    Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different
    sentence under the sentencing procedure described in Lockridge. On remand, the trial
    court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court
    determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional
    constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial
    court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the
    unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other
    respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining
    questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    September 27, 2016
    d0919
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 149647

Filed Date: 9/27/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016