People of Michigan v. Troy Michael Guzikowski ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    October 6, 2017                                                                                      Stephen J. Markman,
    Chief Justice
    152028                                                                                                    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                    Richard H. Bernstein
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                              Joan L. Larsen
    Kurtis T. Wilder,
    Justices
    v                                                                 SC: 152028
    COA: 324584
    Mecosta CC: 07-006086-FC
    TROY MICHAEL GUZIKOWSKI,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    By order of September 27, 2016, the application for leave to appeal the April 14,
    2015 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People
    v Comer (Docket No. 152713). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on
    June 23, 2017, 500 Mich ___ (2017), the application is again considered. Pursuant to
    MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the June 27, 2014
    amended judgment of sentence of the Mecosta Circuit Court, and we REMAND this case
    to the trial court for reinstatement of the August 27, 2007 judgment of sentence. In
    Comer, we held that correcting an invalid sentence by adding a statutorily mandated term
    is a substantive correction that a trial court may make on its own initiative only before
    judgment is entered. In this case, the trial court did not have authority to amend the
    judgment of sentence after entry to add a provision for lifetime electronic monitoring
    under MCL 750.520b(2)(d) and MCL 750.520n.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    ZAHRA, J., states as follows:
    Consistently with my opinion in People v Comer, 500 Mich ____ (2017) (Docket
    No. 152713) (ZAHRA J., concurring in part and dissenting in part), I disagree with the
    majority’s chosen remedy to reinstate the very sentence it properly concluded was
    invalid. Instead of reinstating an invalid sentence that is predicated on an invalid plea, I
    would conclude that the appropriate remedy in this case is to “give the defendant the
    opportunity to elect to allow the plea and sentence to stand or to withdraw the plea.”
    MCR 6.310(C); cf. People v Cobbs, 
    443 Mich 276
     (1993).
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    October 6, 2017
    s1003
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 152028

Filed Date: 10/6/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/9/2017