People of Michigan v. Pamela Kay Blodgett ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                         Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    October 17, 2019                                                                                   Bridget M. McCormack,
    Chief Justice
    158849                                                                                                   David F. Viviano,
    Chief Justice Pro Tem
    Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                      Richard H. Bernstein
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                         Elizabeth T. Clement
    Megan K. Cavanagh,
    Justices
    v                                                                  SC: 158849
    COA: 345616
    Oakland CC: 2018-266486-FH
    PAMELA KAY BLODGETT,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    By order of April 30, 2019, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the
    application for leave to appeal the October 30, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals. On
    order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is
    again considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we
    REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for reconsideration of the scoring of
    Offense Variable (OV) 10. The trial court shall determine if OV 10 was properly assigned
    at 15 points. If not, given the prosecution’s concession that OV 13 was incorrectly scored,
    any reduction in the score of OV 10 would entitle the defendant to resentencing. People v
    Francisco, 
    474 Mich 82
    , 88-89 (2006). If the trial court determines OV 10 is correctly
    scored, the trial court shall articulate on the record the factual findings supporting its legal
    conclusions to facilitate appellate review. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED,
    because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed
    by this Court.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    October 17, 2019
    b1010
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 158849

Filed Date: 10/17/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2019