Estate of Eugene Wayne Hunt v. Roger Drielick ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                              Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    September 18, 2013                                                       Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    146433-5                                                                 Michael F. Cavanagh
    Stephen J. Markman
    Mary Beth Kelly
    Brian K. Zahra
    MARIE HUNT, Personal Representative for the                           Bridget M. McCormack
    ESTATE OF EUGENE WAYNE HUNT,                                                David F. Viviano,
    Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Cross-                                            Justices
    Defendant-Appellant,
    v                                                 SC: 146433
    COA: 
    299405 Bay CC
    : 96-003280-NI
    ROGER DRIELICK and COREY DRIELICK,
    d/b/a ROGER DRIELICK TRUCKING,
    Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/Cross-
    Plaintiffs/Third-Party-Defendants/
    Counter-Defendants,
    and
    GREAT LAKES CARRIERS CORP.,
    Defendant/Cross-Defendant-Appellee,
    and
    GREAT LAKES LOGISTICS & SERVICES, INC.,
    and MERMAID TRANSPORTATION, INC.,
    Defendants/Cross-Defendants,
    and
    SARGENT TRUCKING, INC.,
    Defendant-Appellee,
    and
    NOREEN LUCZAK and THOMAS LUCZAK,
    Third-Party-Defendants/Counter-
    Defendants-Appellees,
    and
    EMPIRE FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE
    COMPANY,
    Garnishee Defendant-Appellee.
    _________________________________________/
    2
    BRANDON JAMES HUBER,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v                                               SC: 146434
    COA: 
    299406 Bay CC
    : 97-003238-NI
    COREY DRIELICK and ROGER DRIELICK,
    d/b/a ROGER DRIELICK TRUCKING,
    Defendants/Third-Party-Plaintiffs,
    and
    GREAT LAKES CARRIERS CORP.,
    Defendant-Appellee,
    and
    GREAT LAKES LOGISTICS & SERVICES, INC.,
    and MERMAID TRANSPORTATION, INC.,
    Defendants,
    and
    SARGENT TRUCKING, INC.,
    Defendant-Appellee,
    and
    GREAT LAKES CARRIERS, INC.,
    Third-Party-Defendant,
    and
    EMPIRE FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE
    COMPANY,
    Garnishee Defendant-Appellee.
    _________________________________________/
    THOMAS LUCZAK and NOREEN LUCZAK,
    Plaintiffs-Appellants,
    v                                               SC: 146435
    COA: 
    299407 Bay CC
    : 96-003328-NI
    COREY DRIELICK and ROGER DRIELICK,
    d/b/a ROGER DRIELICK TRUCKING,
    Defendants-Third-Party-Plaintiffs,
    and
    3
    GREAT LAKES CARRIERS CORP.,
    Defendant-Appellee,
    and
    GREAT LAKES LOGISTICS & SERVICES, INC.,
    and MERMAID TRANSPORTATION, INC.,
    Defendants,
    and
    SARGENT TRUCKING, INC.,
    Defendant-Appellee,
    and
    GREAT LAKES CARRIERS, INC.,
    Third-Party-Defendant,
    and
    EMPIRE FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE
    COMPANY,
    Garnishee Defendant-Appellee.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2012
    judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall
    address: (1) whether a lease agreement is legally implied between Roger Drielick
    Trucking and Great Lakes Carriers Corporation under the facts of the case and under
    applicable federal regulation of the motor carrier industry; and (2) if so, whether the
    Court of Appeals erred in resolving this case on the basis of the first clause of the
    business use exclusion in the non-trucking (bobtail) policy issued by Empire Fire and
    Marine Insurance Company, instead of on the basis of the second clause, which excludes
    coverage for “‘[b]odily injury’ or ‘property damage’ . . . while a covered ‘auto’ is used in
    the business of anyone to whom the ‘auto’ is leased or rented.”
    Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this
    case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    September 18, 2013
    s0911
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 146433

Filed Date: 9/17/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014