Hyde Park Cooperative v. City of Detroit ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                       Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    April 26, 2013                                                                                      Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    146116                                                                                              Michael F. Cavanagh
    Stephen J. Markman
    Mary Beth Kelly
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    HYDE PARK COOPERATIVE, VILLAGE                                                                         David F. Viviano,
    CENTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED DIVIDEND                                                                                 Justices
    HOUSING ASSOCIATION, BOWIN PLACE
    ASSOCIATES LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING
    ASSOCIATION, CAMBRIDGE TOWER
    ASSOCIATES LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING
    ASSOCIATION, FENIMORE LIMITED
    DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSOCIATION,
    MILLENDER CENTER ASSOCIATES LIMITED
    PARTNERSHIP, PLYMOUTH SQUARE
    LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING
    ASSOCIATION, and FOUNTAIN COURT
    CONSUMER HOUSING COOPERATIVE,
    Plaintiffs-Appellants,
    v                                                                SC: 146116
    COA: 303143
    Wayne CC: 10-005687-CZ
    CITY OF DETROIT and BUILDINGS AND
    SAFETY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 24, 2012
    judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in
    lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE footnote 5 of the Court of Appeals
    judgment because the issue was not properly before the Court of Appeals nor necessary
    to its decision. Moreover, we note that a claim for “money damages” such as the one
    rejected by this Court in Lash v Traverse City, 
    479 Mich 180
    , 191-197 (2007), is not
    identical to an action for a refund of an allegedly unlawful exaction. See, e.g.,
    Beachlawn Building Corporation v City of St. Clair Shores, 
    370 Mich 128
     (1963); Bolt v
    City of Lansing, 
    459 Mich 152
     (1998). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED,
    because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed
    by this Court.
    I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    April 26, 2013                      _________________________________________
    p0423                                                              Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 146116

Filed Date: 4/26/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014