People of Michigan v. David Kircher ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    April 5, 2013                                                                                        Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    Michael F. Cavanagh
    Stephen J. Markman
    144740                                                                                                   Mary Beth Kelly
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano,
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                                    Justices
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v                                                                 SC: 144740
    COA: 306579
    Washtenaw CC: 05-001189-FH
    DAVID KIRCHER,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2011
    order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
    failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
    MARKMAN, J. (concurring).
    A five-year prison sentence was imposed on this 66-year-old defendant, an
    apartment building owner, who when the bottom floor of his building flooded with
    sewage, and under what he viewed as emergency circumstances, pumped that sewage
    into a catch basin that ultimately led to the Huron River. Although what defendant did
    was clearly wrong and in violation of the law, I continue to question (as did two other
    justices when this case was originally before the Court) whether the Legislature in
    enacting MCL 324.3115(4) imposed what the lower courts viewed as a mandatory five-
    year prison sentence. See People v Kircher, 
    483 Mich 986
     (2009) (MARKMAN, J.,
    dissenting). However, because this is a motion for relief from judgment and this issue
    has already been decided against defendant and he has not established “good cause” for
    previously failing to raise his new issues, I concur that he is not entitled to relief under
    MCR 6.508(D).
    I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    April 5, 2013                       _________________________________________
    s0402                                                               Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 144740

Filed Date: 4/5/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014