People v. Terrance Smith ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    March 8, 2016                                                                                        Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    151591-2 & (104)(105)(106)(109)(110)                                                                 Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                          Joan L. Larsen,
    Justices
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v                                                                 SC: 151591
    COA: 317812
    Wayne CC: 12-005075-FC
    MARK CARTER,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v                                                                 SC: 151592
    COA: 317828
    Wayne CC: 12-000953-FC
    MARK CARTER,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the motions to add issues, to exceed page limits, and to
    supplement application for leave to appeal are GRANTED. The motions to hold in
    abeyance and to amend motion to hold in abeyance are DENIED. The application for
    leave to appeal the March 17, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and,
    pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND these
    cases to the Wayne Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a
    materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v
    Lockridge, 
    498 Mich 358
     (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure
    described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have
    imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may
    reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not
    have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it
    shall resentence the defendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because
    we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this
    Court.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    March 8, 2016
    s0229
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 151591

Filed Date: 3/8/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/10/2024