People of Michigan v. Schuyler Dion Chenault ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    June 5, 2013                                                                                         Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    Michael F. Cavanagh
    Stephen J. Markman
    146523-4                                                                                                 Mary Beth Kelly
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano,
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                                    Justices
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v                                                                 SC: 146523-4
    COA: 309384, 310456
    Oakland CC: 2008-222726-FC
    SCHUYLER DION CHENAULT,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 27, 2012
    judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall
    include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the Court of Appeals’ decision in
    People v Lester, 
    232 Mich App 262
    , 281 (1998), correctly articulates what a defendant
    must show to establish a Brady violation; (2) whether the Court of Appeals erred when it
    reversed the trial court’s grant of a new trial, which was premised on the prosecution’s
    violation of the rule from Brady v Maryland, 
    373 US 83
    ; 
    83 S Ct 1194
    ; 
    10 L Ed 2d 215
    (1963); and (3) whether trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel under
    Strickland v Washington, 
    466 US 668
    ; 
    104 S Ct 2052
    ; 
    80 L Ed 2d 674
     (1984), for failing
    to exercise reasonable diligence after learning of the existence of the videotaped
    interviews.
    The Criminal Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, the Prosecuting Attorneys
    Association of Michigan, and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to
    file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the
    issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus
    curiae.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    June 5, 2013
    s0529
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 146523

Filed Date: 6/5/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014