Department of Civil Rights v. Michigan High School Athletic Assoc ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                         Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    December 7, 2011                                                                                      Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    143798 & (14)(15)                                                                                     Michael F. Cavanagh
    Marilyn Kelly
    Stephen J. Markman
    Diane M. Hathaway
    Mary Beth Kelly
    DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS, ex rel                                                                        Brian K. Zahra,
    BELINDA ROBBINS, Next Friend of SANG                                                                                 Justices
    WOO ROBBINS,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v                                                                  SC: 143798
    COA: 305894
    MICHIGAN HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC                                      Lenawee CC: 11-004141-CZ
    ASSOCIATION,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    ____________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.
    The application for leave to appeal the September 21, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals
    is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we
    REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted of
    whether the trial court abused its discretion by granting plaintiff’s motion for a
    preliminary injunction, Freeman v Mitchell, 
    198 Mich 207
    , 210 (1917), after considering
    de novo the following threshold issues: (1) whether the Michigan High School Athletic
    Association (MHSAA) is a “state actor” for purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment and
    
    42 USC § 1983
    , see Brentwood Academy v Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Ass’n,
    
    531 US 288
    , 303 (2001); (2) whether, under the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, MCL
    37.2101, et seq., the MHSAA provides a “public service” or constitutes a “place of public
    accommodation,” MCL 37.2301; and (3) whether the MHSAA’s rules categorize persons
    on the basis of an inherently suspect characteristic or jeopardize the exercise of a
    fundamental right; and if not, whether there is a rational basis for the MHSAA’s rules.
    See generally, Nordlinger v Hahn, 
    505 US 1
    , 10 (1992). The motion for stay is
    DENIED.
    We do not retain jurisdiction.
    MARILYN KELLY and HATHAWAY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.
    I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    December 7, 2011                    _________________________________________
    h1130                                                                  Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 143798

Filed Date: 12/7/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014