People of Michigan v. Daniel Horacek ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    May 6, 2016                                                                                          Robert P. Young, Jr.,
    Chief Justice
    152567                                                                                               Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    Bridget M. McCormack
    David F. Viviano
    Richard H. Bernstein
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                                          Joan L. Larsen,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                                                       Justices
    v                                                                 SC: 152567
    COA: 317527
    Oakland CC: 2012-241894-FH
    DANIEL HORACEK,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 15, 2015
    judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Oakland County
    Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after
    the date of this order. In particular, the prosecutor shall address: (1) what exigencies, if
    any, existed at the time of the defendant’s warrantless arrest, see People v Oliver, 
    417 Mich 366
    , 384 (1983), citing United States v Bulman, 667 F2d 1374, 1384 (CA 11, 1982)
    (“[T]he exigent circumstances doctrine is applicable only within the narrow range of
    circumstances that present a real danger to the police or the public or a real danger that
    evidence or a suspect might be lost.”); (2) whether those exigencies justified the
    defendant’s warrantless arrest; (3) whether the defendant’s plea in this case was made
    conditional in light of the tacit consent of the trial court and the prosecutor; (4) whether
    MCR 6.301(C)(2) fully incorporates the conditional plea procedure in People v Reid, 
    420 Mich 326
     (1984), see MCR 6.301, Comments; and (5) if there was a Fourth Amendment
    violation, whether the defendant is entitled to withdraw his plea.
    The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    May 6, 2016
    p0503
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 152567

Filed Date: 5/6/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/7/2016